The uprisings in the Middle East, the unrest that is tearing apart nations such as the Ivory Coast, the bubbling discontent in Greece, Ireland and Britain and the labor disputes in states such as Wisconsin and Ohio presage the collapse of globalization. They presage a world where vital resources, including food and water, jobs and security, are becoming scarcer and harder to obtain. They presage growing misery for hundreds of millions of people who find themselves trapped in failed states, suffering escalating violence and crippling poverty. They presage increasingly draconian controls and force—take a look at what is being done to Pfc. Bradley Manning—used to protect the corporate elite who are orchestrating our demise.
We must embrace, and embrace rapidly, a radical new ethic of simplicity and rigorous protection of our ecosystem—especially the climate—or we will all be holding on to life by our fingertips. We must rebuild radical socialist movements that demand that the resources of the state and the nation provide for the welfare of all citizens and the heavy hand of state power be employed to prohibit the plunder by the corporate power elite. We must view the corporate capitalists who have seized control of our money, our food, our energy, our education, our press, our health care system and our governance as mortal enemies to be vanquished.
Adequate food, clean water and basic security are already beyond the reach of perhaps half the world’s population. Food prices have risen 61 percent globally since December 2008, according to the International Monetary Fund. The price of wheat has exploded, more than doubling in the last eight months to $8.56 a bushel. When half of your income is spent on food, as it is in countries such as Yemen, Egypt, Tunisia and the Ivory Coast, price increases of this magnitude bring with them malnutrition and starvation. Food prices in the United States have risen over the past three months at an annualized rate of 5 percent. There are some 40 million poor in the United States who devote 35 percent of their after-tax incomes to pay for food. As the cost of fossil fuel climbs, as climate change continues to disrupt agricultural production and as populations and unemployment swell, we will find ourselves convulsed in more global and domestic unrest. Food riots and political protests will be inevitable. But it will not necessarily mean more democracy.
The refusal by all of our liberal institutions, including the press, universities, labor and the Democratic Party, to challenge the utopian assumptions that the marketplace should determine human behavior permits corporations and investment firms to continue their assault, including speculating on commodities to drive up food prices. It permits coal, oil and natural gas corporations to stymie alternative energy and emit deadly levels of greenhouse gases. It permits agribusinesses to divert corn and soybeans to ethanol production and crush systems of local, sustainable agriculture. It permits the war industry to drain half of all state expenditures, generate trillions in deficits, and profit from conflicts in the Middle East we have no chance of winning. It permits corporations to evade the most basic controls and regulations to cement into place a global neo-feudalism. The last people who should be in charge of our food supply or our social and political life, not to mention the welfare of sick children, are corporate capitalists and Wall Street speculators. But none of this is going to change until we turn our backs on the Democratic Party, denounce the orthodoxies peddled in our universities and in the press by corporate apologists and construct our opposition to the corporate state from the ground up. It will not be easy. It will take time. And it will require us to accept the status of social and political pariahs, especially as the lunatic fringe of our political establishment steadily gains power. The corporate state has nothing to offer the left or the right but fear. It uses fear—fear of secular humanism or fear of Christian fascists—to turn the population into passive accomplices. As long as we remain afraid nothing will change.
Friedrich von Hayek and Milton Friedman, two of the major architects for unregulated capitalism, should never have been taken seriously. But the wonders of corporate propaganda and corporate funding turned these fringe figures into revered prophets in our universities, think tanks, the press, legislative bodies, courts and corporate boardrooms. We still endure the cant of their discredited economic theories even as Wall Street sucks the U.S. Treasury dry and engages once again in the speculation that has to date evaporated some $40 trillion in global wealth. We are taught by all systems of information to chant the mantra that the market knows best.
It does not matter, as writers such as John Ralston Saul have pointed out, that every one of globalism’s promises has turned out to be a lie. It does not matter that economic inequality has gotten worse and that most of the world’s wealth has became concentrated in a few hands. It does not matter that the middle class—the beating heart of any democracy—is disappearing and that the rights and wages of the working class have fallen into precipitous decline as labor regulations, protection of our manufacturing base and labor unions have been demolished. It does not matter that corporations have used the destruction of trade barriers as a mechanism for massive tax evasion, a technique that allows conglomerates such as General Electric to avoid paying any taxes. It does not matter that corporations are exploiting and killing the ecosystem on which the human species depends for life. The steady barrage of illusions disseminated by corporate systems of propaganda, in which words are often replaced with music and images, are impervious to truth. Faith in the marketplace replaces for many faith in an omnipresent God. And those who dissent—from Ralph Nader to Noam Chomsky—are banished as heretics.
The aim of the corporate state is not to feed, clothe or house the masses, but to shift all economic, social and political power and wealth into the hands of the tiny corporate elite. It is to create a world where the heads of corporations make $900,000 an hour and four-job families struggle to survive. The corporate elite achieves its aims of greater and greater profit by weakening and dismantling government agencies and taking over or destroying public institutions. Charter schools, mercenary armies, a for-profit health insurance industry and outsourcing every facet of government work, from clerical tasks to intelligence, feed the corporate beast at our expense. The decimation of labor unions, the twisting of education into mindless vocational training and the slashing of social services leave us ever more enslaved to the whims of corporations. The intrusion of corporations into the public sphere destroys the concept of the common good. It erases the lines between public and private interests. It creates a world that is defined exclusively by naked self-interest.
The ideological proponents of globalism—Thomas Friedman, Daniel Yergin, Ben Bernanke and Anthony Giddens—are stunted products of the self-satisfied, materialistic power elite. They use the utopian ideology of globalism as a moral justification for their own comfort, self-absorption and privilege. They do not question the imperial projects of the nation, the widening disparities in wealth and security between themselves as members of the world’s industrialized elite and the rest of the planet. They embrace globalism because it, like most philosophical and theological ideologies, justifies their privilege and power. They believe that globalism is not an ideology but an expression of an incontrovertible truth. And because the truth has been uncovered, all competing economic and political visions are dismissed from public debate before they are even heard.
The defense of globalism marks a disturbing rupture in American intellectual life. The collapse of the global economy in 1929 discredited the proponents of deregulated markets. It permitted alternative visions, many of them products of the socialist, anarchist and communist movements that once existed in the United States, to be heard. We adjusted to economic and political reality. The capacity to be critical of political and economic assumptions resulted in the New Deal, the dismantling of corporate monopolies and heavy government regulation of banks and corporations. But this time around, because corporations control the organs of mass communication, and because thousands of economists, business school professors, financial analysts, journalists and corporate managers have staked their credibility on the utopianism of globalism, we speak to each other in gibberish. We continue to heed the advice of Alan Greenspan, who believed the third-rate novelist Ayn Rand was an economic prophet, or Larry Summers, whose deregulation of our banks as treasury secretary under President Bill Clinton helped snuff out some $17 trillion in wages, retirement benefits and personal savings. We are assured by presidential candidates like Mitt Romney that more tax breaks for corporations would entice them to move their overseas profits back to the United States to create new jobs. This idea comes from a former hedge fund manager whose personal fortune was amassed largely by firing workers, and only illustrates how rational political discourse has descended into mindless sound bites.
We are seduced by this childish happy talk. Who wants to hear that we are advancing not toward a paradise of happy consumption and personal prosperity but a disaster? Who wants to confront a future in which the rapacious and greedy appetites of our global elite, who have failed to protect the planet, threaten to produce widespread anarchy, famine, environmental catastrophe, nuclear terrorism and wars for diminishing resources? Who wants to shatter the myth that the human race is evolving morally, that it can continue its giddy plundering of non-renewable resources and its profligate levels of consumption, that capitalist expansion is eternal and will never cease?
Dying civilizations often prefer hope, even absurd hope, to truth. It makes life easier to bear. It lets them turn away from the hard choices ahead to bask in a comforting certitude that God or science or the market will be their salvation. This is why these apologists for globalism continue to find a following. And their systems of propaganda have built a vast, global Potemkin village to entertain us. The tens of millions of impoverished Americans, whose lives and struggles rarely make it onto television, are invisible. So are most of the world’s billions of poor, crowded into fetid slums. We do not see those who die from drinking contaminated water or being unable to afford medical care. We do not see those being foreclosed from their homes. We do not see the children who go to bed hungry. We busy ourselves with the absurd. We invest our emotional life in reality shows that celebrate excess, hedonism and wealth. We are tempted by the opulent life enjoyed by the American oligarchy, 1 percent of whom control more wealth than the bottom 90 percent combined.
The celebrities and reality television stars whose foibles we know intimately live indolent, self-centered lives in sprawling mansions or exclusive Manhattan apartments. They parade their sculpted and surgically enhanced bodies before us in designer clothes. They devote their lives to self-promotion and personal advancement, consumption, parties and the making of money. They celebrate the cult of the self. And when they have meltdowns we watch with gruesome fascination. This empty existence is the one we are taught to admire and emulate. This is the life, we are told, we can all have. The perversion of values has created a landscape where corporate management by sleazy figures like Donald Trump is confused with leadership and where the ability to accumulate vast sums of money is confused with intelligence. And when we do glimpse the poor or working class on our screens, they are ridiculed and taunted. They are objects of contempt, whether on “The Jerry Springer Show” or “Jersey Shore.”
The incessant chasing after status, personal advancement and wealth has plunged most of the country into unmanageable debt. Families, whose real wages have dropped over the past three decades, live in oversized houses financed by mortgages they often cannot repay. They seek identity through products. They occupy their leisure time in malls buying things they do not need. Those of working age spend their weekdays in little cubicles, if they still have steady jobs, under the heels of corporations that have disempowered American workers and taken control of the state and can lay them off on a whim. It is a desperate scramble. No one wants to be left behind.
The propagandists for globalism are the natural outgrowth of this image-based and culturally illiterate world. They speak about economic and political theory in empty clichés. They cater to our subliminal and irrational desires. They select a few facts and isolated data and use them to dismiss historical, economic, political and cultural realities. They tell us what we want to believe about ourselves. They assure us that we are exceptional as individuals and as a nation. They champion our ignorance as knowledge. They tell us that there is no reason to investigate other ways of organizing and governing our society. Our way of life is the best. Capitalism has made us great. They peddle the self-delusional dream of inevitable human progress. They assure us we will be saved by science, technology and rationality and that humanity is moving inexorably forward.
None of this is true. It is a message that defies human nature and human history. But it is what many desperately want to believe. And until we awake from our collective self-delusion, until we carry out sustained acts of civil disobedience against the corporate state and sever ourselves from the liberal institutions that serve the corporate juggernaut—especially the Democratic Party—we will continue to be rocketed toward a global catastrophe.
I agree with your thesis, but not this phrase:
As far as I can tell historically, we have progressed despite ourselves.
The Democrats aren’t the ones who emphasize the concept of the market system solving all of our problems. This is an idea that the Republicans push like there is no tomorrow. So, don’t try to confuse the public by telling us that is what the Democrats are saying.
Very well put! 99.9% fact! While I was reading it, I was thinking: “Why don’t you tell us how you REALLY feel?” But, instead… because it is such a serious and accurate assessment of the current situation, I will respond with a serious and accurate response.
The nefarious thing about a toxic lie is that, in order for it to be believed and then for it to attract a cadre of followers, it must contain a sufficient number of facts. The greater the number of facts (or percentage, which in this case I estimate to be 99.9%), the greater its ability to attract support. This is the fundamental law of any big lie. This, by the way, is also the accepted architecture for the construction of any big myth. Another thing about this kind of lie is that, in order for its supporters to be motivated to believe it, and to carry out the purpose of its author, it must generate the kind of fear that overwhelms those who accept it as the truth. As another example, just look at how religion has successfully used this same architecture to enrich itself at the expense of its followers for thousands of years!
Now that you have the basic blueprint for a really big lie, all you have to do to is calculate the percentage of its fact-content to logically impress you, along with the potential of its fear-content to cause overwhelm. Based on this criteria, this article is right at the top of its game.
And what is its game? It wants to scare you into believing that political socialism is the solution. How many of you are really going to be fooled into believing in an old tried-and-failed solution like this? Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me, right?
Frankly, an article like this makes me start to wonder what Carolyn Baker’s agenda really is…
@ Leon Night. You echo my thoughts exactly. We must be very careful with theses like this. Beguiling and mostly true they can distract us from seeing reality as it is. Nice critique.
Good! You’re thinking for yourselves. However, if such truth (99.9%?)is to be strung together contained within the body of one small article, as apposed to a collection of legend based on astrology and collected over thousands of years translated time and time after reinterpreted time again, as with the scriptures of the old world belief systems, then you agree with the conclusion that there must be something done very soon to counteract the current systems of resource distribution.
What are your alternative visions? Or criticisms specific to what is proposed here?
Yes indeed. Read my book, Navigating The Coming Chaos: A Handbook For Inner Transition!
The term “Globalization” is merely a polite PR term, more acceptable than ‘New World Order’, but really just disguising the only accurate description, “Global Empire”
Amy’s Goodman’s interview with Seymour Hersh yesterday on “Democracy Now”, exposed a scale of deception that the corporate/financial/militarist (and media) Empire, that has taken over, captured, and now “Occupies” our former country, behind the facade of its two-party “Vichy” facade of faux-democratic government, carries on continually to foster wars behind the people’s back.
With the fog-screen of plausible deniability falling away and the evidence of Obama allowing the known terrorist organization MEK to be connected with Mossad, CIA, and JSOC cross-training in Nevada, along with the Iraq-pre-war-like “Iranian Operations Division” and its hundreds of CIA alternate channel intelligence agents, the time seems close when the old Nixon indictment is going to stick to Obama like a burning tire, “what did he know and when did he know it”.
This DGE (Disguised Global Empire) facade is falling apart as quickly as the Nazi Empire’s “Vichy” facade regime as WWII progressed toward its revealing and undeniable conclusions about the truth of the underlying (and lying) Empire and its phony bit players.
Liberty, democracy, justice, & equality
Over
Violent/Vichy
Empire,
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine
Occupy Empire signs:
“The faces of Empire”
Obama = Petain
Romney = Hitler
What gutlessly voting for
‘least worst’ leads to!
Don’t choose either poison pill candidate.
Neither the sugar-coated, nor faster-acting.
The ‘symptom problems’ may seem different,
but the causal cancer of Empire is the same.
Before capital was de facto internationally mobile, corporations were essentially national in scope and, practically speaking, constrained by national boundaries. Governments and labour (through trade unions, which could only have come into being with the support of government), also national in scope, had sufficient power to reign in many of the excesses of corporations. Trade unions could negotiate better wages and working conditions on behalf of labour. Government could regulate the behaviour of corporations to a significant degree to prevent exploitation of labour and, for instance, despoiling of the environment. Essentially, there was nowhere for capital to go. An equilibrium was created between capital, government and labour that gave rise to a period of great and relatively widespread prosperity. It was a golden era of a sort and it is very much understandable that many of us, particularly in North America, hanker for those days.
Now that corporations are multinational and capital is no longer effectively constrained by national boundaries, the equilibrium is gone. In our increasingly global business environment, government and labour are still constrained almost entirely by national boundaries. Capital, on the other hand, is not. Now, capital DOES have somewhere else to go.
If, in any given country, demands on capital made by a government (regulation, taxation, etc.) or by labour (wages, benefits, improved working conditions, etc.) reach a point at which it is more economical/profitable for capital to move than to capitulate, capital moves. As long as lower wages, lower tax rates, less stringent environmental regulations, laxer labour laws, etc. exist somewhere else in the world, it’s a simple business decision, with profit the sole criterion. If the corporation judges more profit can be acquired, the corporation acts. As a result, government and labour have drastically reduced power to provide any meaningful drag on corporate behaviour for the benefit of the community.
Now, governments compete with each other for jobs and tax revenue by lowering corporate taxes, passing “right-to-work” laws, gutting environmental protections, etc. and labour unions watch as plants are moved and their members’ jobs go to lower-priced workers in another country. The equilibrium is gone. Profit trumps all.
Our national and international systems must provide for meaningful control over the activities of capital such that “the few” are not allowed to prosper inordinately at the expense of “the many”. We must ensure that human activity is a race to the top rather than a race to the bottom. If we continue to allow/encourage resources to be allocated based on the “invisible hand” of the market, trusting that the market will somehow provide optimal outcomes, we are effectively abandoning reason and abrogating what I believe is our responsibility to attempt to maximize the common good.